FÜR DIE DAMEN UND
HERREN:
Jens Böhrnsen,
Martin Günthner, Denise Joachim, Joachim Lohse, Renate Jürgens-Pieper,
Karoline Linnert, Ulrich Mäurer, Anja Stahmann, Eva Quante-Brandt
Honorable senators,
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN,
We, the members of the
presidium of the INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY,
starting with the official registration (1996), focused on the
development of social projects for a distant prospect, id est
quite radical. As is known, such projects require for their
implementation the highly qualified specialists - but at the
same time deprived of conservatism. But it is almost impossible.
Therefore, such projects for a very long time remain only
projects, they can even cause an irritation of the specialists
and their negative reaction.
Way out of the
situation here is one: the solution of the implementation of
such projects should take the higher persons responsible for the
welfare and safety of the people, but the responsibility for a
quality of implementation should be strong specialists, without
the right to sabotage. To help for the development can the
tipping political realities.
A similar situation
was with you, and therefore we address you.
For the tests, we
address you only on one project out of all our 11 ones: the
joint preparation to the innovative education. As it is known,
it was prepared by a decision of the European Parliament, 2008
(DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
concerning the European Year of Creativity and Innovation (2009)
- the COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Brussels,
28.3.2008).
For the first two
years we studied via the Internet, the European sources of
information about the ongoing reforms there - for example,
European conferences, meetings, the generalized report of the
institute of the city of Seville, etc. And we saw that a very
small number of teachers from the countries of the EU had taken
this decision positively. The more so it is evident in Russia,
where all our people are entranced with the Bologna convention
and are behind the life for many years. And about the reforms in
Europe concerning the European Year of Creativity and Innovation
(2009) they do not actually know anything.
Meanwhile, now with
every year, it becomes clear that it is necessary to have the
gradual replacement of the whole concept of the current
education, the departure from the old system, when the heads of
the students are poured with buckets of ready-made knowledge and
the teachers evaluate the study progress by the students’
capability to remember. This leads to transformation of the
people to full conservatives, to the atrophy of creative
instincts. And the whole blocks of young people are thrown out
to the backyard to the side to alcohol, drugs and criminality.
Science tends to infinite observations. We, the society, need
flexible creative people, who since childhood see around
disadvantages and their effective remedy. It
is
the
system
we
offer.
To date, we have
developed a detailed substantiation of the system of education,
prepared and issued in small circulation the tutorial NOVISTICS
(the first, the main book - the second book is being prepared).
This is "for all".
We also showed the
necessity, possibility and expediency of creation of special
Universities of creativity for creatively talented students that
can then create the appropriate companies for the creative
helping others. Note: in any case, all of these people will
never be ballasts for the society.
All this we learn from
1973-75 years, when we were still military experts in
anti-missile defense. And we are ready to open all this for your
specialists for subsequent implementation in schools and even in
the form the first in Europe a special university. Of course, if
your finance department bares some expenditures for the "Group
of perspective development", in which the 2 - 3 - 4 person will
be from Russia.
It should be noted
that we, of course, from the outset addressed to your classical
science. We were obliged to do it. And we have got a very fast
and quite a formal refusal. That was what we had expected. It
was strange the only thing that we got this refusal at the level
of the secretariat, although the issue concerns the matters of
principle. Apparently, we made mistakes even earlier, referring
to the disinterested people (for example, in Dusseldorf).
On this issue one
should say the following. In the end, the history evaluates any
government by the effectiveness of the conducted transformations
for population, for his safety and well-being. By the way, one
of our projects provides for the calculation (along with the
GDP) the statistic indicator of integral social development.
And in general: in addition to the development of the economy we
offer special development "sociomy".
However, I have to say
at once that the absence of your positive response to this
letter (that is, unwillingness to work with us on any of our
programs) will not be able to shake us in our respect for you.
We will just believe that our projects do come not at the proper
place or not at the proper time.
With the best regards,
Boris A. Minin
President of the International Public Development Academy,
Chief of the Federal Centre of certification,
Inventor,
Doctor of engineering, Full doctor of economics,
professor,
Academician of the International Academy of informatization
(UN)
+7
(495) 475 96 28; (903) 542 35 95
(only in Russian);
av122356@comtv.ru
I'm sorry that we do not write in German
language: it would have been too risky.
|
